Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice issue.

Data vary significantly on the variety of medical errors that happen in the United States. Some studies put the number of medical errors in excess of one million each year while other studies position the number as low as a couple of hundred thousand. It is extensively accepted however that iatrogenic illness (illness or injury caused by a medical error or medical treatment) is the third leading cause of death in the United States after cardiovascular disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As a lawyer who has actually limited his practice to representation of victims injured by another person's carelessness, medical or otherwise, I have actually gotten thousands of calls from potential clients over the last Twenty Years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Considering that medical malpractice litigation is very pricey and really protracted the legal representatives in our company are really cautious what medical malpractice cases in which we opt to get involved. It is not unusual for a lawyer, or law firm to advance litigation expenditures in excess of $100,000.00 just to obtain a case to trial. These costs are the costs associated with pursuing the lawsuits which include professional witness charges, deposition expenses, exhibit preparation and court costs. What follows is a summary of the concerns, concerns and factors to consider that the attorneys in our company think about when going over with a customer a prospective medical malpractice case.

What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Requirement of Care" for medical doctors (or nurses, chiropractors, dental professionals, podiatrists etc.) which results in an injury or death. "Requirement of Care" means medical treatment that a sensible, prudent medical company in the same community ought to offer. The majority of cases include a conflict over what the suitable standard of care is. The standard of care is generally provided through using professional testimony from consulting physicians that practice or teach medication in the exact same specialized as the defendant( s).

When did the malpractice occur (Statute of Limitations)? " target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of restrictions is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the defendant treated the complainant (victim) or the date the plaintiff found or fairly need to have discovered the malpractice. Some states have a 2 year statute of constraints. In Ohio if the victim is a minor the statute of limitations will not even begin to run until the minor ends up being 18 years old. Be encouraged however derivative claims for parents might run many years earlier. If you think you might have a case it is very important you contact a legal representative soon. Regardless of the statute of constraints, physicians transfer, witnesses disappear and memories fade. The sooner counsel is engaged the quicker essential proof can be maintained and the better your possibilities are of dominating.

What did the doctor do or fail to do?

Merely because a client does not have a successful result from a surgical treatment, medical procedure or medical treatment does not in and of itself indicate the medical professional slipped up. Medical practice is by no suggests a guarantee of good health or a complete recovery. Most of the time when a client experiences a not successful result from medical treatment it is not since the medical supplier slipped up. Most of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is regardless of great, quality medical care not because of sub-standard treatment.

Damage limit in local medical malpractice case goes to appeal, could set new law - Local News - Colorado Springs Independent

Damage limit in local medical malpractice case goes to appeal, could set new law - Local News - Colorado Springs Independent

“Manifestly unfair” Damage limit in local medical malpractice case goes to appeal, could set new law - Local News - Colorado Springs Independent

When discussing a potential case with a client it is essential that the client have the ability to tell us why they believe there was medical negligence. As we all understand people typically pass away from cancer, cardiovascular disease or organ failure even with great medical care. However, we likewise know that individuals typically must not pass away from knee surgery, appendix removal, hernia repair work or some other "minor" surgical treatment. When something really unforeseen like that happens it certainly is worth exploring whether there was a medical mistake. If in doubt most medical malpractice attorneys will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. Most lawyers do not charge for an initial consultation in negligence cases.

So what if there was a medical error (proximate cause)?

In any carelessness case not just is the burden of proof on the plaintiff to show the medical malpractice the complainant must likewise show that as a direct result of the medical neglect some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "proximate cause." Because medical malpractice litigation is so costly to pursue the injuries should be substantial to call for progressing with the case. All medical mistakes are "malpractice" however only a little percentage of mistakes give rise to medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his kid to the emergency clinic after a skateboard accident and the ER physician does not do x-rays regardless of an apparent bend in the kid's lower arm and informs the dad his son has "just a sprain" this most likely is medical malpractice. But, if the child is correctly detected within a few days and makes a complete healing it is unlikely the "damages" are severe adequate to carry out a claim that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. Nevertheless, if because of the hold-up in being properly identified, the boy has to have his arm re-broken and the development plate is irreparably damaged due to the delay then the damages likely would necessitate additional investigation and a possible suit.

Other essential factors to consider.

Other problems that are important when determining whether a client has a malpractice case include the victim's habits and case history. Did the victim do anything to cause or add to the bad medical result? A common technique of medical malpractice defense lawyer is to blame the patient. If it is a birth trauma case, did the mama have proper prenatal care, did she smoke or utilize drugs during her pregnancy? In other cases, did the client follow the physician's orders, keep his visits, take his medicine as instructed and inform the doctor the fact? These are truths that we need to know in order to determine whether the physician will have a valid defense to the malpractice claim?

What takes place if it looks like there is a case?

If it appears that the patient may have been a victim of a medical error, the medical mistake caused a considerable injury or death and the patient was compliant with his physician's orders, then we need to get the client's medical records. In most cases, obtaining the medical records involves absolutely nothing more mailing a release signed by the client to the medical professional and/or medical facility together with a letter requesting the records. In the case of wrongful death, an executor of the victims estate needs to be appointed in the regional county court of probate and after that the executor can sign the release requesting the records.

As soon as the records are gotten we review them to make sure they are complete. It is not uncommon in medical neglect cases to get insufficient medical charts. Once are acquired they are offered to a certified medical specialist for review and opinion. If the case is against an emergency clinic doctor we have an emergency clinic physician evaluate the case, if it protests a cardiologist we have to acquire a viewpoint from a cardiologist, and so on

. Primarily, what we would like to know form the specialist is 1) was the medical care provided listed below the requirement of care, 2) did the offense of the standard of care result in the clients injury or death? If the physicians viewpoint agrees with on both counts a suit will be prepared on the client's behalf and typically submitted in the court of common pleas in the county where the malpractice was dedicated or in the county where the offender lives. In some limited scenarios jurisdiction for the malpractice suit could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, an excellent malpractice lawyer will carefully and completely examine any potential malpractice case prior to submitting a claim. It's unfair to the victim or the physicians to file a suit unless the professional informs us that he thinks there is a strong basis to bring the claim. Due to the expense of pursuing a medical negligence action no good legal representative has the time or resources to waste on a "pointless lawsuit."

When consulting with a malpractice legal representative it is very important to properly provide the lawyer as much information as possible and answer the legal representative's questions as entirely as possible. Prior to talking with an attorney think about making some notes so you remember some essential fact or scenario the legal representative might need.

Lastly, if you think you might have a malpractice case contact a good malpractice lawyer as soon as possible so there are no statute of restrictions issues in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *